Farm Subsidy information
Crook County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Crook County, Oregon, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 502
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Crook County, Oregon totaled $28,995,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
201 | Timothy Van Domelen | Powell Butte, OR 97753 | $12,536 |
202 | Jim England | Powell Butte, OR 97753 | $12,427 |
203 | Dean Pettyjohn | Powell Butte, OR 97753 | $12,312 |
204 | Norman D Maley | Powell Butte, OR 97753 | $12,271 |
205 | Philip H Moerschell | Post, OR 97752 | $12,070 |
206 | Mario Villastrigo | Powell Butte, OR 97753 | $11,887 |
207 | Dennis Hilderbrand | Powell Butte, OR 97753 | $11,822 |
208 | Roan Ranch Company | Prineville, OR 97754 | $11,821 |
209 | Alec E Gaynor | Sisters, OR 97759 | $11,753 |
210 | Michael Smith | Prineville, OR 97754 | $11,590 |
211 | Bar Lyn Ranch | Powell Butte, OR 97753 | $11,071 |
212 | John W Dehler III | Prineville, OR 97754 | $10,966 |
213 | Kirk Simmons | Prineville, OR 97754 | $10,736 |
214 | Trevor Glynn Aldrich | Terrebonne, OR 97760 | $10,714 |
215 | Pacific Firs LLC | Terrebonne, OR 97760 | $10,572 |
216 | , | $10,563 | |
217 | Charles Raymond Dill | Prineville, OR 97754 | $10,231 |
218 | Jim E Mcfarlane | Redmond, OR 97756 | $10,218 |
219 | Milo B Mccright | Powell Butte, OR 97753 | $10,205 |
220 | Jane Howell Estate | Prineville, OR 97754 | $10,160 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”