Farm Subsidy information
Crook County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Crook County, Oregon, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 502
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Crook County, Oregon totaled $28,995,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Wymore | Prineville, OR 97754 | $57,514 |
82 | Pioneer Cut Stock Inc | Prineville, OR 97754 | $57,385 |
83 | Kriege Logging LLC | Prineville, OR 97754 | $52,875 |
84 | B & S Logging Inc | Prineville, OR 97754 | $52,875 |
85 | Mark Stafford Dba Mark Stafford Trucking | Prineville, OR 97754 | $52,875 |
86 | Ochoco Wood Products LLC | Prineville, OR 97754 | $52,875 |
87 | Steven Lieser | Prineville, OR 97754 | $51,740 |
88 | Rye Grass Farms | Prineville, OR 97754 | $50,081 |
89 | Lawrence E Sale | Powell Butte, OR 97753 | $49,445 |
90 | Beers Cattle Company Inc | Powell Butte, OR 97753 | $48,509 |
91 | William R Guthrie | Prineville, OR 97754 | $47,754 |
92 | Gary Gumpert | Prineville, OR 97754 | $47,123 |
93 | Ochoco Valley Ranch LLC | Bend, OR 97701 | $46,153 |
94 | Sigman Ranch | Prineville, OR 97754 | $45,492 |
95 | Charles G Hegele Jr | Terrebonne, OR 97760 | $45,428 |
96 | Doris E Arntz | Bend, OR 97709 | $44,410 |
97 | Arrowhead Logging LLC | Prineville, OR 97754 | $43,731 |
98 | Glenn D Ridgway/ Dba - Ridgway A | Prineville, OR 97754 | $42,467 |
99 | T Y Ranch | Terrebonne, OR 97760 | $42,420 |
100 | Butler Ranch Inc | Terrebonne, OR 97760 | $41,459 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”