Total Commodity Programs in Douglas County, Oregon, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 716
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Douglas County, Oregon totaled $12,440,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Deanna Gilbert | Roseburg, OR 97470 | $21,397 |
102 | Cms Sheep Company | The Dalles, OR 97058 | $21,329 |
103 | Holcomb Bros Inc | Oakland, OR 97462 | $20,864 |
104 | Keller Lumber Company | Roseburg, OR 97470 | $20,843 |
105 | Guy Kennerly | Roseburg, OR 97470 | $20,605 |
106 | Frank Tunno | Roseburg, OR 97471 | $19,631 |
107 | Don E Bailey | Roseburg, OR 97471 | $19,088 |
108 | Westwind Fisheries | Winchester Bay, OR 97467 | $18,984 |
109 | James C Jones | Oakland, OR 97462 | $18,968 |
110 | Lester R Ocumpaugh | Oakland, OR 97462 | $18,895 |
111 | Frost Fisheries | Reedsport, OR 97467 | $18,860 |
112 | Pachamama Farm | Days Creek, OR 97429 | $18,530 |
113 | John William Nicholson | Roseburg, OR 97470 | $18,463 |
114 | Reustle Vineyards & Winery, LLC | Umpqua, OR 97486 | $18,134 |
115 | Jackie L Twyman | Roseburg, OR 97471 | $17,840 |
116 | William Gilbreath Ranch | Roseburg, OR 97470 | $17,755 |
117 | John Quimby | Idleyld Park, OR 97447 | $17,302 |
118 | Michelle Yow-woodley | Sutherlin, OR 97479 | $16,163 |
119 | Michael C Wetherell | Umpqua, OR 97486 | $16,122 |
120 | James Mast | Yoncalla, OR 97499 | $16,062 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”