Farm Subsidy information
Gilliam County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Gilliam County, Oregon, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 935
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gilliam County, Oregon totaled $214,731,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hardie Family General Partnership | Redmond, OR 97756 | $1,548,937 |
22 | Kamerrer Farms Inc | Condon, OR 97823 | $1,534,695 |
23 | Douglas E Wilson | Condon, OR 97823 | $1,515,199 |
24 | Jack Osterlund | Condon, OR 97823 | $1,453,124 |
25 | Ray W Lantis | Mayville, OR 97830 | $1,429,338 |
26 | Anderson Qtr Cir W Ranch | Condon, OR 97823 | $1,373,554 |
27 | David A Wade | Arlington, OR 97812 | $1,281,537 |
28 | James B Greiner | Mayville, OR 97830 | $1,261,384 |
29 | Integro Inc | Condon, OR 97823 | $1,255,265 |
30 | Jean Mansfield | Wasco, OR 97065 | $1,212,496 |
31 | John D Burns | Portland, OR 97210 | $1,199,702 |
32 | Melvin Pattee | Condon, OR 97823 | $1,174,129 |
33 | Philippi Ranches Inc | Hermiston, OR 97838 | $1,149,352 |
34 | Igo Ranch | Condon, OR 97823 | $1,140,880 |
35 | J S Burres And Sons | Condon, OR 97823 | $1,123,044 |
36 | Riney & Anderson Inc | Condon, OR 97823 | $1,078,195 |
37 | Kenneth Burres | Madras, OR 97741 | $1,074,746 |
38 | Jasper Edwards | Condon, OR 97823 | $1,015,817 |
39 | Plateau Farm | Portland, OR 97204 | $975,867 |
40 | Riney & Riney Inc | Arlington, OR 97812 | $929,751 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”