Farm Subsidy information
Hood River County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Hood River County, Oregon, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 425
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hood River County, Oregon totaled $43,607,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | George Ing | Hood River, OR 97031 | $26,609 |
182 | Fidel Gamboa | Hood River, OR 97031 | $26,326 |
183 | Joseph W Sheirbon | Hood River, OR 97031 | $26,316 |
184 | Leroy C Nickerson | Hood River, OR 97031 | $25,885 |
185 | Lore Ann Sterr | Hood River, OR 97031 | $25,408 |
186 | Joe C Sheirbon | Hood River, OR 97031 | $25,145 |
187 | Reva Collins | Hood River, OR 97031 | $24,712 |
188 | Deborde Agri-management Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $24,458 |
189 | Sheppard Orchards, Inc. | Hood River, OR 97031 | $23,794 |
190 | Elisea Orchards LLC | Hood River, OR 97031 | $23,450 |
191 | Munk Mountain Orchard LLC | Hood River, OR 97051 | $23,209 |
192 | Sheirbon Sheirbon & Sheirbon | Hood River, OR 97031 | $22,864 |
193 | Charlotte Peters | Hood River, OR 97031 | $22,241 |
194 | Antony Peters | Hood River, OR 97031 | $21,589 |
195 | Cloud's End | Hood River, OR 97031 | $21,225 |
196 | Lahti Enterprises Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $20,779 |
197 | Paul D Haake | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $20,337 |
198 | Deleted | Burbank, CA 91505 | $19,579 |
199 | J Scott Hagee | Hood River, OR 97031 | $19,323 |
200 | Terry Endow | Hood River, OR 97031 | $19,234 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”