Farm Subsidy information
Hood River County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Hood River County, Oregon, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 425
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hood River County, Oregon totaled $43,607,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Webster Orchards Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $1,003,703 |
| 2 | Walter Wells & Sons LLC | Hood River, OR 97031 | $961,024 |
| 3 | Dog River Ranch LLC | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $814,759 |
| 4 | Hood River Cherry Company | Hood River, OR 97031 | $808,431 |
| 5 | Lage Orchards Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $663,139 |
| 6 | Ron Rivers Orchards, Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $646,030 |
| 7 | Mcnerney Farms Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $614,701 |
| 8 | Morale Orchards LLC | Hood River, OR 97031 | $607,226 |
| 9 | Cpa Inds Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $600,623 |
| 10 | Golden Mountain LLC | Hood River, OR 97031 | $569,279 |
| 11 | Yasui Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $532,503 |
| 12 | George Aubert Orchards Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $528,380 |
| 13 | Kiyokawa Orchards Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $491,380 |
| 14 | Riparian Maid Orchards LLC | Porterville, CA 93257 | $487,984 |
| 15 | Thomsen Orchards Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $471,432 |
| 16 | Equinox Tree & Vine LLC | Porterville, CA 93257 | $468,489 |
| 17 | Upland Fruit Co. Inc. | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $425,280 |
| 18 | Valley Crest Orchard Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $423,616 |
| 19 | Laurance Bros Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $407,364 |
| 20 | Td Hilton Farms Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $404,445 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
