Farm Subsidy information
Hood River County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Hood River County, Oregon, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 191
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hood River County, Oregon totaled $20,360,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Klindt Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $274,156 |
| 22 | Cara D Sanders | Hamilton, MS 39746 | $271,255 |
| 23 | Yasui Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $269,683 |
| 24 | Golden Mountain LLC | Hood River, OR 97031 | $268,401 |
| 25 | Von Lubken Orchards Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $256,756 |
| 26 | Bickford Orchards Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $253,460 |
| 27 | Valley Crest Orchard Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $244,200 |
| 28 | Equinox Tree & Vine LLC | Porterville, CA 93257 | $235,889 |
| 29 | Oates Orchards Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $228,850 |
| 30 | Pine Grove Orchards LLC | Helix, OR 97835 | $217,337 |
| 31 | Halliday Fruit Inc | Parkdale, OR 97041 | $212,486 |
| 32 | Goe Brothers LLC | Odell, OR 97044 | $205,817 |
| 33 | Boi, LLC | Hood River, OR 97031 | $202,447 |
| 34 | M Goe & Son Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $201,990 |
| 35 | Upland Fruit Co. Inc. | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $182,927 |
| 36 | Glacier Ranch Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $162,867 |
| 37 | Hirata Orchards Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $148,458 |
| 38 | Gray Orchards Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $148,278 |
| 39 | Benjamin Orchards Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $145,514 |
| 40 | Fox Family Ranches LLC | Hood River, OR 97031 | $144,047 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf