Total Conservation Programs in Jackson County, Oregon, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 125
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Jackson County, Oregon totaled $858,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Harry Schneider | Eagle Point, OR 97524 | $2,228 |
62 | Cecil Waldron | Grants Pass, OR 97526 | $2,186 |
63 | Scott E Loomis | Rogue River, OR 97537 | $2,140 |
64 | Nancy Ames Cole | Ashland, OR 97520 | $2,110 |
65 | Joe G Dauenhauer Sr | Ashland, OR 97520 | $1,989 |
66 | Richard Thornton | Ashland, OR 97520 | $1,882 |
67 | William Rennick Jr | Medford, OR 97504 | $1,876 |
68 | Lee Korner | Central Point, OR 97502 | $1,755 |
69 | Terry M Weyers | Shady Cove, OR 97539 | $1,672 |
70 | Bill Robertson | Ashland, OR 97520 | $1,651 |
71 | Phil Clark | Ashland, OR 97520 | $1,598 |
72 | Richard L Smith | Palm Springs, CA 92264 | $1,470 |
73 | John Buma Jr | Rogue River, OR 97537 | $1,457 |
74 | Harriett Rex Smith | Ashland, OR 97520 | $1,392 |
75 | Obstinate J Ranch | Trail, OR 97541 | $1,350 |
76 | Edwin G Krebs | Seattle, WA 98112 | $1,331 |
77 | Mike Meredith | Medford, OR 97501 | $1,303 |
78 | Sherman Lamb | Talent, OR 97540 | $1,300 |
79 | Clifford Davidson | Central Point, OR 97502 | $1,268 |
80 | Donald E Fichtner | Medford, OR 97501 | $1,256 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”