Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Klamath County, Oregon, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 396
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Klamath County, Oregon totaled $12,724,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | M & A Livestock | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $682,007 |
2 | Drew Hill | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $455,272 |
3 | Leroy V Traynham | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $353,349 |
4 | Royal Crown Cattle Co | Silver Lake, OR 97638 | $342,632 |
5 | Jacob E Northcutt | Malin, OR 97632 | $291,159 |
6 | Topham Family Trust | Sprague River, OR 97639 | $287,082 |
7 | Roger Nicholson | Fort Klamath, OR 97626 | $268,548 |
8 | Steve K Gorden | Bonanza, OR 97623 | $253,855 |
9 | Sheree Owens | Fort Klamath, OR 97626 | $244,108 |
10 | Rice Cattle LLC | Clements, CA 95227 | $239,239 |
11 | Kevin D Newman | Bly, OR 97622 | $219,694 |
12 | Famoso Cattle Co Inc | Chiloquin, OR 97624 | $215,567 |
13 | Jennifer M Rice | Bly, OR 97622 | $204,836 |
14 | Moss Ranch LLC | Bonanza, OR 97623 | $202,590 |
15 | Darrel Bagley | Bonanza, OR 97623 | $198,598 |
16 | Balin Farm Trust | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $183,013 |
17 | Scott L Runels | Fort Rock, OR 97735 | $168,280 |
18 | Richard Foreman | San Jose, CA 95135 | $164,135 |
19 | Davie Leon Landis | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $157,763 |
20 | Geof Miller | Orland, CA 95963 | $148,819 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>