Farm Subsidy information
Klamath County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Klamath County, Oregon, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 460
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Klamath County, Oregon totaled $12,799,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richard Foreman | San Jose, CA 95135 | $98,115 |
22 | Lynn E Long | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $94,711 |
23 | Petes Valley Livestock LLC | Woodland, CA 95695 | $85,133 |
24 | Kevin D Newman | Bly, OR 97622 | $83,483 |
25 | H & T Organics | Malin, OR 97632 | $80,084 |
26 | Whiskey Creek Ranch | Sprague River, OR 97639 | $77,435 |
27 | Roger Nicholson | Fort Klamath, OR 97626 | $76,273 |
28 | Klamath Algae Products Inc Dba E3live | Klamath Falls, OR 97601 | $76,252 |
29 | Jacob E Northcutt | Malin, OR 97632 | $75,948 |
30 | Robert L Unruh Farms Inc | Malin, OR 97632 | $75,372 |
31 | Moss Ranch LLC | Bonanza, OR 97623 | $61,560 |
32 | Jennifer M Rice | Bly, OR 97622 | $60,989 |
33 | Taylor Hyde Dba Yainix Ranch | Chiloquin, OR 97624 | $60,788 |
34 | Moxley Brothers Farms | Bonanza, OR 97623 | $60,549 |
35 | Scott L Runels | Fort Rock, OR 97735 | $59,454 |
36 | William Leonard Gallagher | Bonanza, OR 97623 | $58,675 |
37 | Dunlea Farm & Ranch LLC | Malin, OR 97632 | $58,383 |
38 | Amanda Dee Havard | Forest, MS 39074 | $56,676 |
39 | Kandra Five Farm LLC | Merrill, OR 97633 | $55,503 |
40 | Darrell Jacobs Trucking Inc | Klamath Falls, OR 97601 | $52,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”