Farm Subsidy information
Lane County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Lane County, Oregon, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 202
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lane County, Oregon totaled $4,394,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Thompson Land | Heppner, OR 97836 | $16,578 |
62 | Brice Family Farms Inc | Junction City, OR 97448 | $16,076 |
63 | Mark C Mcfarland | Cottage Grove, OR 97424 | $15,735 |
64 | Central Coast Timber LLC | Mapleton, OR 97453 | $15,521 |
65 | Tyler Potter Dba Tyler Potter Livestock Services | Cottage Grove, OR 97424 | $15,334 |
66 | Donald H Smyth | Junction City, OR 97448 | $15,282 |
67 | Sharon A Simpson-carroll Dba Or-west Trees | Junction City, OR 97448 | $14,717 |
68 | Rock'n D Ranch Inc | Junction City, OR 97448 | $14,406 |
69 | Nathan G Large | Florence, OR 97439 | $14,354 |
70 | Robert J Hise | Cheshire, OR 97419 | $14,131 |
71 | Hoiland Farms Inc | Eugene, OR 97408 | $13,780 |
72 | Barbara Anheluk | Fall Creek, OR 97438 | $13,644 |
73 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $13,125 |
74 | Penny Jordan | Springfield, OR 97478 | $12,612 |
75 | Dan R Moore | Creswell, OR 97426 | $12,052 |
76 | Cierra Wilson | Creswell, OR 97426 | $10,199 |
77 | Drew Campbell | Cottage Grove, OR 97424 | $9,412 |
78 | Jb & Son Inc | Junction City, OR 97448 | $9,300 |
79 | Nicholas A Sumich | Blachly, OR 97412 | $9,105 |
80 | Lavelle Vineyards Inc | Elmira, OR 97437 | $9,090 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”