Farm Subsidy information
Sherman County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Sherman County, Oregon, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 445
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sherman County, Oregon totaled $12,002,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Linnea Holmes | Kent, OR 97033 | $66,074 |
42 | Keith Blaylock | Wasco, OR 97065 | $62,789 |
43 | James & Dorene Macnab | Wasco, OR 97065 | $62,432 |
44 | Patricia Ann Benson | Grass Valley, OR 97029 | $60,698 |
45 | Ronald W Holmes | Kent, OR 97033 | $58,288 |
46 | 4m Farms | Wasco, OR 97065 | $57,026 |
47 | Heather Thompson | Moro, OR 97039 | $56,281 |
48 | Simantel Family Farm Inc | Wasco, OR 97065 | $55,347 |
49 | , | $55,332 | |
50 | Wb Ranch | Grass Valley, OR 97029 | $54,716 |
51 | L & C Kent Property LLC | Grand Junction, CO 81506 | $54,670 |
52 | Martin Cattle Co | Rufus, OR 97050 | $53,585 |
53 | Larry Von Borstel | Grass Valley, OR 97029 | $51,994 |
54 | Sather Ranch LLC | Kent, OR 97033 | $51,831 |
55 | Hattrup Family LLC | San Rafael, CA 94903 | $51,743 |
56 | Pauline Salomon | Grass Valley, OR 97029 | $50,000 |
57 | Janet M Wilson | The Dalles, OR 97058 | $50,000 |
58 | Lee Barnett | Butte, MT 59701 | $50,000 |
59 | Steven A Prock & Kittie M Prock Fam Trust | Eagle Creek, OR 97022 | $49,800 |
60 | Ryan Dean Thompson | Moro, OR 97039 | $48,940 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”