Conservation Reserve Program in Umatilla County, Oregon, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 577
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Umatilla County, Oregon totaled $9,276,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Ukiah Land Company | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $27,376 |
102 | Larry S Hoeft Dba Bar 41 Ranch | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $27,354 |
103 | Lincton Mountain Property LLC | Milton Freewater, OR 97862 | $27,271 |
104 | , | $26,648 | |
105 | Betty Branstetter | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $26,646 |
106 | Jrw Agri L.l.c | Milton Freewater, OR 97862 | $26,440 |
107 | John Adams Inc | Adams, OR 97810 | $26,370 |
108 | Pendleton Ranches Inc | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $25,877 |
109 | Mary A Long | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $25,724 |
110 | Kelly Springer | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $25,087 |
111 | Rkl Ranches LLC | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $24,562 |
112 | V H Rogers Farms | Concord, MA 01742 | $24,380 |
113 | Whit Whit LLC | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $24,232 |
114 | Lestant - Lestant K Porter Revocable Liv Keith Por | Gold Canyon, AZ 85118 | $23,685 |
115 | Cody L Porter | Pilot Rock, OR 97868 | $23,159 |
116 | Kirk Fenley | La Grande, OR 97850 | $22,963 |
117 | Charles Kopp Trust | Pilot Rock, OR 97868 | $22,204 |
118 | Michael A Bott | Graham, WA 98338 | $22,156 |
119 | Mcbroom Family Disclaimer Trust, Originally Dated | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $22,086 |
120 | Charlie Doherty | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $21,986 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”