Counter Cyclical Program in Pennsylvania, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 12,273
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Pennsylvania totaled $48,483,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Yahner Brothers Farms | Patton, PA 16668 | $36,934 |
122 | Nelson Welles | Towanda, PA 18848 | $35,979 |
123 | Ernst Conservation Seeds | Meadville, PA 16335 | $35,752 |
124 | Zimmerman Farms | Pitman, PA 17964 | $35,684 |
125 | Red Knob Farm | Peach Bottom, PA 17563 | $35,584 |
126 | Oregon Dairy Farm LLC | Lititz, PA 17543 | $35,574 |
127 | Skyblu Farms Inc | Felton, PA 17322 | $35,436 |
128 | Yeo Farms LLC | Lowellville, OH 44436 | $34,867 |
129 | Raymond J Byler | Belleville, PA 17004 | $34,798 |
130 | Steven Wolfe Dba Oak Spring Farms | Centre Hall, PA 16828 | $34,672 |
131 | Stanley J Burkholder | Chambersburg, PA 17202 | $34,602 |
132 | Jeff Pontius | Sunbury, PA 17801 | $34,266 |
133 | Slate Ridge Dairy Farm Inc | Saint Thomas, PA 17252 | $34,107 |
134 | Felix Masser | Leck Kill, PA 17836 | $34,074 |
135 | Walmoore Holsteins Inc | West Grove, PA 19390 | $33,948 |
136 | Bortnick Dairy LLC | Conneautville, PA 16406 | $33,616 |
137 | T Scott Moore | Jersey Shore, PA 17740 | $33,348 |
138 | Rodrick K Hinish | Williamsburg, PA 16693 | $33,195 |
139 | Troyer Land Resources Inc | Waterford, PA 16441 | $32,910 |
140 | James R Hoover | Newport, PA 17074 | $32,905 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”