Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Pennsylvania, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,414

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Pennsylvania totaled $13,943,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
121Daniel Z EshGordonville, PA 17529$28,422
122Kevin J DiehlFairfield, PA 17320$27,521
123Woerner And Eiker Farms IncGettysburg, PA 17325$27,504
124Foundation For California UniversCalifornia, PA 15419$27,380
125Kevin L DibbleSmethport, PA 16749$27,310
126Thomas D GardnerBellefonte, PA 16823$27,013
127James M YounkerFleetwood, PA 19522$27,000
128Rodney E SnyderDornsife, PA 17823$26,784
129David B H DenoonWycombe, PA 18980$26,700
130Raymond And Annette KuzmaTunkhannock, PA 18657$26,688
131Houstin L LichtenwalnerEmmaus, PA 18049$26,625
132Edko FarmsUlysses, PA 16948$26,513
133David K LongenbachNorthampton, PA 18067$26,400
134Benny A SnyderMilton, PA 17847$26,244
135Ralph E Latimer JrRed Lion, PA 17356$26,218
136Valerie V BerlingerCarversville, PA 18913$26,077
137Nelson N WeaverManheim, PA 17545$26,042
138Donald SalakWaymart, PA 18472$26,000
139Dale Edward MaulfairJonestown, PA 17038$25,967
140David C Lamb JrConneautville, PA 16406$25,772

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag