Miscellaneous Disaster Programs in Pennsylvania, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,003
Recipients of Miscellaneous Disaster Programs from farms in Pennsylvania totaled $13,707,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Fulton Logging LLC | Home, PA 15747 | $52,875 |
62 | Wenturine Bros Lumber Inc | Nicktown, PA 15762 | $52,875 |
63 | Nolo Ridge Forest Products | Penn Run, PA 15765 | $52,875 |
64 | Watt Lumber, Inc | Brockway, PA 15824 | $52,875 |
65 | Preston Lumber | Brockway, PA 15824 | $52,875 |
66 | Mumford Enterprises Inc | Corsica, PA 15829 | $52,875 |
67 | Dale Francis Reynolds | Summerville, PA 15864 | $52,875 |
68 | James D Smay Dba Tree Expert Tree Service | Johnstown, PA 15902 | $52,875 |
69 | Industrial Timber & Pulp LLC | New Galilee, PA 16141 | $52,875 |
70 | Romeo Forestry LLC | Volant, PA 16156 | $52,875 |
71 | Kth Inc | New Bethlehem, PA 16242 | $52,875 |
72 | Dm Sorvelli LLC | Russell, PA 16345 | $52,875 |
73 | Blue Ox Timber Resources | Titusville, PA 16354 | $52,875 |
74 | Rab Trucking Inc | Titusville, PA 16354 | $52,875 |
75 | Greenchain Enterprise LLC | Irvona, PA 16656 | $52,875 |
76 | Cfs Logging And Excavating LLC | Tyrone, PA 16686 | $52,875 |
77 | Carl Doug Shultz | Williamsburg, PA 16693 | $52,875 |
78 | Asel Enterprises Inc | Kane, PA 16735 | $52,875 |
79 | Jason R Payne | Kane, PA 16735 | $52,875 |
80 | Gary T Rossman Logging | Kane, PA 16735 | $52,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”