Counter Cyclical Program in Pennsylvania, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 12,273
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Pennsylvania totaled $48,483,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Maple Spring Farms | Airville, PA 17302 | $70,957 |
22 | Pleasant View Farms Inc | Martinsburg, PA 16662 | $70,801 |
23 | Leshers Poultry Farm Inc | Chambersburg, PA 17202 | $70,132 |
24 | Harold Stephen Wiser | Fairview, PA 16415 | $69,863 |
25 | Hostetter Farm Supply Inc | Hanover, PA 17331 | $69,685 |
26 | John G Weinhofer | Whitehall, PA 18052 | $69,512 |
27 | Silver Maple Farms | Cochranville, PA 19330 | $69,066 |
28 | L Marshall Metzler | Martinsburg, PA 16662 | $68,821 |
29 | Paul Dotterer & Sons Inc | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $66,281 |
30 | Stover Farms | Carlisle, PA 17015 | $66,275 |
31 | David P Anthony | Rochester Mills, PA 15771 | $65,892 |
32 | Michael W Ohler | Polk, PA 16342 | $63,894 |
33 | Leroy C Stahler Inc | Center Valley, PA 18034 | $62,888 |
34 | John E Shearer Jr | Spring Grove, PA 17362 | $62,882 |
35 | L E T Farms Inc | Germansville, PA 18053 | $62,256 |
36 | Elvin E Stoltzfus | Lewisburg, PA 17837 | $61,779 |
37 | Hetrickdale Farms LLC | Bernville, PA 19506 | $60,393 |
38 | Richard L Schlosberg | Thornton, PA 19373 | $59,941 |
39 | Stoner's Hijos Hill Inc | Mercersburg, PA 17236 | $59,828 |
40 | Halabura Farms | Orwigsburg, PA 17961 | $58,630 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”