Farm Subsidy information
Armstrong County, Pennsylvania
Total Subsidies in Armstrong County, Pennsylvania, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 93
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Armstrong County, Pennsylvania totaled $1,933,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Boarts Farm | Ford City, PA 16226 | $11,365 |
22 | John Bennett | Kittanning, PA 16201 | $11,041 |
23 | Shan-mar Jerseys LLC | Dayton, PA 16222 | $10,452 |
24 | Alexander D Claypoole | Worthington, PA 16262 | $9,736 |
25 | Nicole C Claypoole | Worthington, PA 16262 | $9,736 |
26 | Ronald E Bowser | Kittanning, PA 16201 | $9,103 |
27 | Larry Martin | Kittanning, PA 16201 | $8,756 |
28 | Spurgeon R Shilling | New Bethlehem, PA 16242 | $8,282 |
29 | Jerry L Claypool | Worthington, PA 16262 | $8,250 |
30 | Henry Miller And Sons | Kittanning, PA 16201 | $7,886 |
31 | Jerry D Toy | Worthington, PA 16262 | $7,794 |
32 | J Scott Bowser | New Bethlehem, PA 16242 | $7,011 |
33 | Tim Claypoole | Kittanning, PA 16201 | $6,951 |
34 | Jeffrey Mckinley | Kittanning, PA 16201 | $6,779 |
35 | Fred Mattilio | Rural Valley, PA 16249 | $6,102 |
36 | Frank Bordenick | Strabane, PA 15363 | $5,992 |
37 | Richard A Brocious | Worthington, PA 16262 | $5,936 |
38 | James D Goldinger | Worthington, PA 16262 | $5,845 |
39 | Guy L Wolfgang | Creekside, PA 15732 | $5,703 |
40 | Stephen B Maul | Worthington, PA 16262 | $5,420 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”