Total Commodity Programs in Beaver County, Pennsylvania, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 355
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Beaver County, Pennsylvania totaled $6,650,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Daniel Brenner | Rochester, PA 15074 | $27,876 |
62 | Richard S Mc Anlis | New Galilee, PA 16141 | $27,858 |
63 | George Conkle | Hookstown, PA 15050 | $27,617 |
64 | Samuel B Kuhlber | New Galilee, PA 16141 | $27,141 |
65 | Krut Farm LLC | Fombell, PA 16123 | $27,001 |
66 | Carl Young | New Brighton, PA 15066 | $26,425 |
67 | Blinn Brothers | New Brighton, PA 15066 | $26,256 |
68 | Paul T Czar | Ellwood City, PA 16117 | $26,230 |
69 | Scott L Wright | Harmony, PA 16037 | $25,994 |
70 | Zana G Anderson | Enon Valley, PA 16120 | $25,768 |
71 | Wayne A Bacon | New Springfield, OH 44443 | $25,224 |
72 | Robert Mcroberts | Enon Valley, PA 16120 | $24,102 |
73 | Jeff Pflug | Fombell, PA 16123 | $24,096 |
74 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $23,333 |
75 | Robert B Jackson Jr | New Galilee, PA 16141 | $23,293 |
76 | Mary Ann Brenckle | Zelienople, PA 16063 | $23,235 |
77 | Farin R Weltner | Georgetown, PA 15043 | $23,219 |
78 | John M Cooper Jr | Beaver Falls, PA 15010 | $22,120 |
79 | Aaron P Sturges | Fombell, PA 16123 | $21,574 |
80 | Mary Susan Mcroberts | Enon Valley, PA 16120 | $21,361 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”