Counter Cyclical Program in Bedford County, Pennsylvania, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 269
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Bedford County, Pennsylvania totaled $1,136,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | L Marshall Metzler | Martinsburg, PA 16662 | $51,342 |
2 | David Hernley | Osterburg, PA 16667 | $43,738 |
3 | Hoover Brothers | Everett, PA 15537 | $29,570 |
4 | Frederick Farm Inc | Bedford, PA 15522 | $24,052 |
5 | Carl Egolf Jr | Schellsburg, PA 15559 | $21,854 |
6 | Singing Brook Farms | Imler, PA 16655 | $21,133 |
7 | Jtj Wakefield Farm Inc | Bedford, PA 15522 | $19,991 |
8 | Three Spr Run Farm | New Enterprise, PA 16664 | $19,864 |
9 | Charles Hershberger | Martinsburg, PA 16662 | $19,712 |
10 | Barry L & Brian L Woy Ptr | Everett, PA 15537 | $18,836 |
11 | Alan E Ickes | Osterburg, PA 16667 | $18,802 |
12 | H Landon Henry | Bedford, PA 15522 | $18,449 |
13 | L & L Holsteins | New Enterprise, PA 16664 | $16,778 |
14 | Fred A & Bruce O Shankle Partnership | Schellsburg, PA 15559 | $15,938 |
15 | John W Shaffer Jr & Sons | New Paris, PA 15554 | $14,961 |
16 | Wagner Farm | Bedford, PA 15522 | $14,908 |
17 | Richard A Deputy | Bedford, PA 15522 | $14,854 |
18 | Rodney Hershberger | Everett, PA 15537 | $13,722 |
19 | Frederick E Claycomb | Bedford, PA 15522 | $13,713 |
20 | Helsel Farms | Woodbury, PA 16695 | $11,518 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>