Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Clinton County, Pennsylvania, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 60
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Clinton County, Pennsylvania totaled $554,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Willis Miller | Loganton, PA 17747 | $914 |
42 | Thomas R Vilello III | Lock Haven, PA 17745 | $881 |
43 | Marjorie Bechdel | Beech Creek, PA 16822 | $838 |
44 | Samuel J Allgyer Jr | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $820 |
45 | Elam F Fisher | Loganton, PA 17747 | $780 |
46 | Todd Peters | Beech Creek, PA 16822 | $736 |
47 | Randy L Peters | Beech Creek, PA 16822 | $680 |
48 | Howard G Tompkins II | Lamar, PA 16848 | $670 |
49 | Red Ghost Alpacas LLC | Beech Creek, PA 16822 | $618 |
50 | Timothy Owens | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $585 |
51 | Jesse S Glick | Loganton, PA 17747 | $540 |
52 | Pamela M Snook | Loganton, PA 17747 | $462 |
53 | George J Toner | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $452 |
54 | Elam E Stoltzfus Jr | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $440 |
55 | Dotterer Farms | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $402 |
56 | Daniel J Heggenstaller | Loganton, PA 17747 | $362 |
57 | Leonard D Johnson Sr | Lock Haven, PA 17745 | $320 |
58 | Mickey J Knarr | Beech Creek, PA 16822 | $288 |
59 | Daniel L King | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $240 |
60 | Jay E Martin | Beech Creek, PA 16822 | $125 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
<< Previous