Farm Subsidy information
Clinton County, Pennsylvania
Total Subsidies in Clinton County, Pennsylvania, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 98
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clinton County, Pennsylvania totaled $1,843,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | William C Muthler Sr Irrevocable Trust | Beech Creek, PA 16822 | $17,969 |
22 | John F Stoltzfus | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $17,664 |
23 | Crist Farm | Jersey Shore, PA 17740 | $17,140 |
24 | Elam E Stoltzfus Jr | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $15,033 |
25 | George W Courter | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $12,642 |
26 | Gerald L Seyler | Jersey Shore, PA 17740 | $11,640 |
27 | Wayne Laubscher | Lock Haven, PA 17745 | $9,520 |
28 | Jacob V Heisey | Jersey Shore, PA 17740 | $9,019 |
29 | Allen F Berry | Beech Creek, PA 16822 | $8,976 |
30 | Robert J Saxon | Lock Haven, PA 17745 | $8,562 |
31 | Philip D Courter | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $8,372 |
32 | Stephen M Dunkle | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $7,241 |
33 | Shawn D Moore | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $6,981 |
34 | Bprcv Limited Partnership | Williamsport, PA 17702 | $6,391 |
35 | Blair Courter | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $5,853 |
36 | David P Showan | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $5,825 |
37 | Ben L Carson | Jersey Shore, PA 17740 | $5,524 |
38 | Keith L Carson | Jersey Shore, PA 17740 | $5,517 |
39 | Mickey J Knarr | Beech Creek, PA 16822 | $5,159 |
40 | Nathan Walizer | Loganton, PA 17747 | $4,709 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”