Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Lawrence County, Pennsylvania, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 35
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Lawrence County, Pennsylvania totaled $66,988 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | John Gebhart | New Castle, PA 16102 | $9,384 |
2 | Gary Fulkman | New Wilmington, PA 16142 | $6,743 |
3 | Mary Jo Reynolds | Enon Valley, PA 16120 | $5,083 |
4 | B Timothy Sturgeon | Fombell, PA 16123 | $4,005 |
5 | Rocky Favorite | New Castle, PA 16101 | $3,349 |
6 | Grassycrest Farms Inc | Slippery Rock, PA 16057 | $2,952 |
7 | James F Mc Cormick | New Castle, PA 16101 | $2,768 |
8 | Ronald E Gargasz | Volant, PA 16156 | $2,411 |
9 | Richard Wright | New Castle, PA 16101 | $2,264 |
10 | J. Kenneth Craig | New Galilee, PA 16141 | $2,119 |
11 | Hamco Inc | New Castle, PA 16102 | $2,018 |
12 | John Paul Czubek | New Wilmington, PA 16142 | $1,881 |
13 | David R Whiting | Edinburg, PA 16116 | $1,700 |
14 | Willard Mc Conahy | Pulaski, PA 16143 | $1,625 |
15 | Michael Lehman | New Wilmington, PA 16142 | $1,513 |
16 | Patricia R Byers | Enon Valley, PA 16120 | $1,489 |
17 | Gary Harman | New Castle, PA 16102 | $1,453 |
18 | Thomas J Mc Conahy Jr | Volant, PA 16156 | $1,404 |
19 | Robert E. Kern | New Castle, PA 16101 | $1,380 |
20 | Dennis J Crowl | Enon Valley, PA 16120 | $1,206 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>