Total Conservation Programs in Lawrence County, Pennsylvania, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 118
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Lawrence County, Pennsylvania totaled $1,710,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | David R Whiting | Edinburg, PA 16116 | $1,700 |
82 | Willard Mc Conahy | Pulaski, PA 16143 | $1,625 |
83 | Edward Nicol | Enon Valley, PA 16120 | $1,609 |
84 | Michael Lehman | New Wilmington, PA 16142 | $1,513 |
85 | Patricia R Byers | Enon Valley, PA 16120 | $1,489 |
86 | John T Haney | New Castle, PA 16101 | $1,480 |
87 | Gary Harman | New Castle, PA 16102 | $1,453 |
88 | Thomas J Mc Conahy Jr | Volant, PA 16156 | $1,404 |
89 | Longview Farms | Enon Valley, PA 16120 | $1,404 |
90 | Robert E. Kern | New Castle, PA 16101 | $1,380 |
91 | Wampum Green Lane LLC | Wampum, PA 16157 | $1,242 |
92 | Dennis J Crowl | Enon Valley, PA 16120 | $1,206 |
93 | Kathryn M Wear | New Castle, PA 16102 | $1,194 |
94 | John K Craig Jr | New Galilee, PA 16141 | $1,170 |
95 | Mark A Gorgacz | New Castle, PA 16101 | $1,112 |
96 | Patrice Lucidore | New Castle, PA 16101 | $1,108 |
97 | Wendell Mc Kissick | Slippery Rock, PA 16057 | $1,097 |
98 | Harris Mc Clelland | Carlisle, PA 17013 | $1,020 |
99 | Fred Martsolf | Enon Valley, PA 16120 | $951 |
100 | James Frew | Ellwood City, PA 16117 | $910 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”