Farm Subsidy information
Lawrence County, Pennsylvania
Total Subsidies in Lawrence County, Pennsylvania, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 650
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lawrence County, Pennsylvania totaled $38,286,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | John Shulack Jr | Enon Valley, PA 16120 | $80,915 |
102 | Randy Eppinger | Slippery Rock, PA 16057 | $80,540 |
103 | Howard Leslie | Enon Valley, PA 16120 | $78,973 |
104 | Lee Huston | Enon Valley, PA 16120 | $77,388 |
105 | Mcbride Beef Farms | Enon Valley, PA 16120 | $76,808 |
106 | Mc Dowell Farms LLC | New Castle, PA 16102 | $75,726 |
107 | James F Mc Cormick | New Castle, PA 16101 | $75,163 |
108 | Gary Harman | New Castle, PA 16102 | $70,348 |
109 | George A Wilson | Volant, PA 16156 | $69,638 |
110 | Charles Wilson | Portersville, PA 16051 | $69,324 |
111 | Leckwart Farm Market LLC | New Castle, PA 16102 | $68,918 |
112 | Harold L Householder | New Galilee, PA 16141 | $68,772 |
113 | John Kolehmainen | Enon Valley, PA 16120 | $68,586 |
114 | Anna Jane Yakubik | New Castle, PA 16101 | $67,262 |
115 | , | $67,239 | |
116 | James Frew | Ellwood City, PA 16117 | $66,483 |
117 | Howard C Craig | New Castle, PA 16102 | $66,264 |
118 | Mitcheltree Brothers Logging & Lumber Inc | New Castle, PA 16101 | $65,399 |
119 | Richard Weingartner | New Castle, PA 16101 | $64,593 |
120 | Jeremiah Maher | New Castle, PA 16105 | $63,453 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”