Farm Subsidy information
Northumberland County, Pennsylvania
Total Subsidies in Northumberland County, Pennsylvania, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 186
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Northumberland County, Pennsylvania totaled $3,197,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wayne Klock | Sunbury, PA 17801 | $19,124 |
22 | Martz Farms | Danville, PA 17821 | $18,388 |
23 | Kevin D Brosious | Sunbury, PA 17801 | $18,244 |
24 | Persimmon Hollow Organic Farms, L | Dornsife, PA 17823 | $17,748 |
25 | Sidney Phillips | Dalmatia, PA 17017 | $16,742 |
26 | Gary P Sweppenhiser | Herndon, PA 17830 | $16,221 |
27 | Nancy L Masser | Klingerstown, PA 17941 | $16,117 |
28 | , | $14,745 | |
29 | Martz Game Farm Family Ltd Ptrshp | Dalmatia, PA 17017 | $14,742 |
30 | Harold M Korbich | Paxinos, PA 17860 | $13,734 |
31 | Shaffer Productions Inc | Dalmatia, PA 17017 | $12,559 |
32 | Lavern Peachy | Milton, PA 17847 | $12,328 |
33 | Roger V Wiest II | Sunbury, PA 17801 | $11,984 |
34 | Richard H Stahl Sons Inc | Sunbury, PA 17801 | $11,875 |
35 | Robert Faust Jr | Dalmatia, PA 17017 | $11,712 |
36 | Ervin E Smucker | Herndon, PA 17830 | $11,708 |
37 | Mark Sweppenhiser | Harrisburg, PA 17110 | $11,537 |
38 | Wilbert C Smeltz | Dornsife, PA 17823 | $10,945 |
39 | Garvin C Schaffer II | Dornsife, PA 17823 | $10,507 |
40 | Ethan Witmer | Sunbury, PA 17801 | $10,073 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”