Total Conservation Programs in Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 140
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania totaled $329,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Darrell R Kunkel | Orwigsburg, PA 17961 | $3,128 |
42 | Helen E Masser | Sacramento, PA 17968 | $3,125 |
43 | George Sidella | Schuylkill Haven, PA 17972 | $3,103 |
44 | Stephen L Frantz | Pine Grove, PA 17963 | $2,831 |
45 | Pine Valley Sportsmens Club Inc | Orwigsburg, PA 17961 | $2,809 |
46 | Mary Temprovich | Mcadoo, PA 18237 | $2,752 |
47 | Louis J Temprovich Sr | Mcadoo, PA 18237 | $2,752 |
48 | Carl G Sensenig | Denver, PA 17517 | $2,556 |
49 | Blue Nob Rod And Gun Club | Coopersburg, PA 18036 | $2,510 |
50 | Todd Heisler | Tamaqua, PA 18252 | $2,491 |
51 | Markus F Middlecamp | Munich, 80997 | $2,369 |
52 | Mary Anczarski | Shenandoah, PA 17976 | $2,336 |
53 | David Cook | Schuylkill Haven, PA 17972 | $2,318 |
54 | David H Kehler | Pitman, PA 17964 | $2,261 |
55 | Daniel Grow Jr | Ringtown, PA 17967 | $2,215 |
56 | Hinkel Farms LLC | Ashland, PA 17921 | $2,114 |
57 | Kelly J Singley | Zion Grove, PA 17985 | $1,934 |
58 | Edward Careyva | Ringtown, PA 17967 | $1,844 |
59 | Kswz Partnership | Valley View, PA 17983 | $1,834 |
60 | Dennis J Marbarger | Schuylkill Haven, PA 17972 | $1,757 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”