Total Commodity Programs in Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 772
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania totaled $33,942,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Halabura Farms | Orwigsburg, PA 17961 | $1,777,245 |
2 | Zimmerman Farms | Pitman, PA 17964 | $1,089,695 |
3 | Helen E Masser | Sacramento, PA 17968 | $868,010 |
4 | Haas Farms | Klingerstown, PA 17941 | $751,649 |
5 | James D Dunn | New Ringgold, PA 17960 | $591,715 |
6 | Craig Rhein | Pine Grove, PA 17963 | $536,270 |
7 | Eric Todd Wolfe | Pine Grove, PA 17963 | $528,739 |
8 | Jersey Acres Farms Inc | Pine Grove, PA 17963 | $515,831 |
9 | Lewistown Valley Enterprises Dba Koch's Turkey Far | Tamaqua, PA 18252 | $510,850 |
10 | Wind Mill Farm | Pine Grove, PA 17963 | $490,356 |
11 | Kevin M Haas | Pitman, PA 17964 | $456,114 |
12 | Koch Farm Service Inc | Tamaqua, PA 18252 | $454,318 |
13 | Sterman Masser Inc | Sacramento, PA 17968 | $439,519 |
14 | Ryan A Kahler | Pitman, PA 17964 | $436,135 |
15 | Fort Jackson Logging LLC | Spring Glen, PA 17978 | $429,000 |
16 | Dennis Rebuck | Hegins, PA 17938 | $422,152 |
17 | Carl A Farms Inc | Pitman, PA 17964 | $403,300 |
18 | Edward Careyva | Ringtown, PA 17967 | $396,876 |
19 | Hepler Homestead Farms LLC | Pitman, PA 17964 | $380,576 |
20 | Van Hoekelen Greenhouses Inc | Mcadoo, PA 18237 | $351,183 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>