Dairy Programs in Wayne County, Pennsylvania, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 262
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Wayne County, Pennsylvania totaled $7,135,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Martin Paul Medved | Union Dale, PA 18470 | $264,230 |
2 | Jack Chyle | Pleasant Mount, PA 18453 | $240,728 |
3 | David Noble | Beach Lake, PA 18405 | $151,564 |
4 | Darl Haynes | Starrucca, PA 18462 | $139,442 |
5 | Stephen Non | Pleasant Mount, PA 18453 | $138,715 |
6 | Charles J Theobald | Waymart, PA 18472 | $138,658 |
7 | Eroh Dairy | Pleasant Mount, PA 18453 | $137,760 |
8 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $134,681 |
9 | Paul Sheroshek | Forest City, PA 18421 | $132,080 |
10 | Jonas Cold Spring Farm | Pleasant Mount, PA 18453 | $119,938 |
11 | Willard And Louis Diehl | Damascus, PA 18415 | $113,351 |
12 | John Rickard Jr | Honesdale, PA 18431 | $106,994 |
13 | Rowe Brothers | Honesdale, PA 18431 | $104,292 |
14 | Donald Stiles | Honesdale, PA 18431 | $104,236 |
15 | Highland Farm Enterprises, LLC | Honesdale, PA 18431 | $103,640 |
16 | Harold Welch | Starrucca, PA 18462 | $101,822 |
17 | Nicholas Gary Kravetsky | Thompson, PA 18465 | $100,366 |
18 | Walter Blum | Milanville, PA 18443 | $93,910 |
19 | Jack Downton | Starrucca, PA 18462 | $93,203 |
20 | D Ellis Dix | Pleasant Mount, PA 18453 | $90,459 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>