Farm Subsidy information
Wayne County, Pennsylvania
Total Subsidies in Wayne County, Pennsylvania, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 460
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wayne County, Pennsylvania totaled $15,341,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | John Pawloski | Lake Ariel, PA 18436 | $60,206 |
82 | Mark Latourette | Honesdale, PA 18431 | $57,020 |
83 | Mary Evans | Honesdale, PA 18431 | $56,001 |
84 | George Swingle | Lake Ariel, PA 18436 | $55,358 |
85 | Mary Ann Miller | Waymart, PA 18472 | $55,209 |
86 | Irene M Curtis | Pleasant Mount, PA 18453 | $54,506 |
87 | Daniel Conlogue | Honesdale, PA 18431 | $53,299 |
88 | Robert Munger | Honesdale, PA 18431 | $53,257 |
89 | Canfield Logging LLC | Damascus, PA 18415 | $52,875 |
90 | Edward Cerar | Union Dale, PA 18470 | $52,383 |
91 | David Banicky | Thompson, PA 18465 | $51,873 |
92 | Brian W Smith | Milanville, PA 18443 | $51,635 |
93 | Steven C Richner Jr | Pleasant Mt, PA 18453 | $51,601 |
94 | John Wetmore | Honesdale, PA 18431 | $51,567 |
95 | Robert J Suhosky | Honesdale, PA 18431 | $51,422 |
96 | Gerald Rickard | Honesdale, PA 18431 | $50,405 |
97 | Janet Curtis | Forest City, PA 18421 | $50,215 |
98 | Gerald Latourette | Honesdale, PA 18431 | $49,550 |
99 | William R Adams | Tyler Hill, PA 18469 | $49,179 |
100 | David Snutes | Pleasant Mount, PA 18453 | $48,964 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”