Farm Subsidy information
Rhode Island
Total Subsidies in Rhode Island, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 856
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Rhode Island totaled $31,938,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | , | $258,829 | |
22 | James, Barry C | Bradford, RI 02808 | $255,733 |
23 | Wishing Stone Inc | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $250,028 |
24 | Prevail Fisheries Inc | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $250,000 |
25 | Karen Sue Inc | Wakefield, RI 02880 | $250,000 |
26 | Rjr Fisheries Inc | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $250,000 |
27 | Jessie Jean Enterprises | Peace Dale, RI 02883 | $250,000 |
28 | Palombo Fishing Corp | Newport, RI 02840 | $247,879 |
29 | Heather Lynn Inc | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $247,828 |
30 | , | $238,883 | |
31 | Brook Knoll Farm | Hope Valley, RI 02832 | $233,876 |
32 | Sakonnet Oyster Co Inc | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $225,472 |
33 | Michael Perugino | Cranston, RI 02921 | $224,557 |
34 | Washington County Turf Inc | West Kingston, RI 02892 | $222,924 |
35 | The Rhode Island Nurseries Inc | Middletown, RI 02842 | $222,831 |
36 | Robert W Krause | Charlestown, RI 02813 | $215,714 |
37 | Mooresfield Oyster Farm LLC | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $206,162 |
38 | Allen Harbor Oyster Inc | Saunderstown, RI 02874 | $205,537 |
39 | Salt Pond Fisheries Inc | Wakefield, RI 02880 | $194,553 |
40 | Peter W Brown | Bristol, RI 02809 | $188,134 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”