Farm Subsidy information
Newport County, Rhode Island
Total Subsidies in Newport County, Rhode Island, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 54
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Newport County, Rhode Island totaled $875,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wishing Stone Inc | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $3,790 |
22 | Golden Nugget Oysters LLC | Portsmouth, RI 02871 | $3,160 |
23 | Skinny Dip Farm | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $3,089 |
24 | Little State Flower Company | Tiverton, RI 02878 | $2,859 |
25 | , | $2,344 | |
26 | Greenvale Vineyards Ltd | Portsmouth, RI 02871 | $2,223 |
27 | Franlart Nurseries Inc | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $2,156 |
28 | Society For The Preservation Of | Boston, MA 02114 | $1,995 |
29 | Mark Goerner | Jamestown, RI 02835 | $1,732 |
30 | Amy Rodrigues | Middletown, RI 02842 | $1,534 |
31 | Windy Hill Nurseries Inc | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $1,481 |
32 | Brian Simmons | Middletown, RI 02842 | $1,010 |
33 | New England Grass-fed LLC | Hope Valley, RI 02832 | $899 |
34 | J And M Agriculture Garman Farm | Newport, RI 02840 | $881 |
35 | Shirley Tribou | Fairhaven, MA 02719 | $808 |
36 | Farm Coast Brewery LLC | Tiverton, RI 02878 | $764 |
37 | Fieldstone Gardens Inc | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $763 |
38 | Antonio Pinheiro | Jamestown, RI 02835 | $545 |
39 | , | $542 | |
40 | E George Neale | Jamestown, RI 02835 | $524 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”