Farm Subsidy information
Providence County, Rhode Island
Total Subsidies in Providence County, Rhode Island, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 235
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Providence County, Rhode Island totaled $7,135,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Flora Niquette | Foster, RI 02825 | $2,783 |
122 | Twin Pine Farms | Cranston, RI 02921 | $2,772 |
123 | Allan Hill | Johnston, RI 02919 | $2,558 |
124 | Warren Hill | Johnston, RI 02919 | $2,558 |
125 | Carl R Adler | Greenville, RI 02828 | $2,501 |
126 | Polly Hopkins | Chepachet, RI 02814 | $2,492 |
127 | Stamp Egg Farms Inc | Johnston, RI 02919 | $2,375 |
128 | Hopkins Southdowns | North Scituate, RI 02857 | $2,345 |
129 | Hanna Abboud | Smithfield, RI 02917 | $2,283 |
130 | Patricia Jaswell | Smithfield, RI 02917 | $2,277 |
131 | Michael Tortorella | Cranston, RI 02921 | $2,266 |
132 | Harry Mac Hedgpeth | Charlestown, RI 02813 | $2,195 |
133 | Michael Valentine | Foster, RI 02825 | $2,123 |
134 | Nick Doyle LLC | North Scituate, RI 02857 | $2,123 |
135 | , | $2,075 | |
136 | Teodulio Martinez Del Rosario | Providence, RI 02905 | $2,040 |
137 | Linda Amore | North Scituate, RI 02857 | $1,998 |
138 | Alfonse Amore | North Scituate, RI 02857 | $1,998 |
139 | Roger Phillips | North Scituate, RI 02857 | $1,842 |
140 | Myra S Phillips | North Scituate, RI 02857 | $1,804 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”