Farm Subsidy information
South Carolina
Total Subsidies in South Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,068
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Carolina totaled $165,170,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | , | $191,654 | |
42 | Les Galloway | Darlington, SC 29532 | $184,547 |
43 | Oak III Farms | Summerton, SC 29148 | $183,429 |
44 | Patrick E Burch | Lake City, SC 29560 | $174,603 |
45 | Gaddys Mill Farms | Dillon, SC 29536 | $170,982 |
46 | Lee Newman | Sumter, SC 29153 | $170,408 |
47 | Caughman And Son Farms LLC | Sumter, SC 29153 | $170,233 |
48 | Irving M Benton Jr | Walterboro, SC 29488 | $167,789 |
49 | Cowden Plantation Farms LLC | Jackson, SC 29831 | $162,372 |
50 | Franklin R Gleason | Darlington, SC 29540 | $161,836 |
51 | Jerry Lee Mcelveen Jr | New Zion, SC 29111 | $160,115 |
52 | Kylie D Strickland | Nichols, SC 29581 | $159,525 |
53 | John Mcinnis Farms Inc | Clio, SC 29525 | $158,374 |
54 | James B Johnson Jr | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $158,316 |
55 | Haigler Farms Partnership | Cameron, SC 29030 | $158,285 |
56 | Chappell Brothers Farm | Barnwell, SC 29812 | $158,140 |
57 | Boyd Farms | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $151,997 |
58 | James Michael Dubose LLC | Monetta, SC 29105 | $148,791 |
59 | Jeffery A Sweatman | Saint George, SC 29477 | $145,668 |
60 | Willard Dorriety Jr | Florence, SC 29501 | $144,204 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”