Total Disaster Programs in South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 976
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in South Carolina totaled $16,691,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | T3 Chipping LLC | Batesburg-leesville, SC 29070 | $52,875 |
42 | Three Rivers Timber Company Inc | Walterboro, SC 29488 | $52,875 |
43 | H & H Construction & Storm Services, Inc. | Florence, SC 29505 | $52,875 |
44 | Travis Logging LLC | Bowman, SC 29018 | $52,875 |
45 | G & G Logging Inc | Bowman, SC 29018 | $52,875 |
46 | Mckittrick Timber LLC | Heath Springs, SC 29058 | $52,875 |
47 | Ayer Logging LLC | Ehrhardt, SC 29081 | $52,875 |
48 | Ems Chipping LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $52,875 |
49 | K & W Logging LLC | Neeses, SC 29107 | $52,875 |
50 | A&m Logging LLC | Neeses, SC 29107 | $52,875 |
51 | Auto Merchants Of South Carolina LLC | Newberry, SC 29108 | $52,875 |
52 | Kunkle Logging Inc | Newberry, SC 29108 | $52,875 |
53 | Rango Williams Logging LLC | North, SC 29112 | $52,875 |
54 | Tri County Timber, LLC. | Orangeburg, SC 29116 | $52,875 |
55 | Whitney L Ott Streamline Timber LLC | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $52,875 |
56 | Joe Nathan Brown Sr | Ridgeway, SC 29130 | $52,875 |
57 | A&h Logging, LLC | Salley, SC 29137 | $52,875 |
58 | Rocky Grove Timber, LLC | Salley, SC 29137 | $52,875 |
59 | Southern Timber Inc. | Salley, SC 29137 | $52,875 |
60 | Mcnair Timber LLC | Wagener, SC 29164 | $52,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”