Counter Cyclical Program in South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 10,715
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in South Carolina totaled $190,224,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Durant Farms | Gable, SC 29051 | $411,002 |
62 | Dargan Farms Partnership | Darlington, SC 29540 | $401,918 |
63 | William C Covington Jr | Clio, SC 29525 | $399,809 |
64 | L H Youmans Jr Robert A Youmans Sr | Furman, SC 29921 | $398,734 |
65 | W H Bull | Cameron, SC 29030 | $394,927 |
66 | William C Holman Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $394,442 |
67 | Carrollton Farms | Furman, SC 29921 | $393,058 |
68 | Francis M Hinson III | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $392,620 |
69 | Double B Farms | Bamberg, SC 29003 | $392,572 |
70 | Jerry Yonce | Aiken, SC 29801 | $391,254 |
71 | Kendall Wannamaker | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $386,709 |
72 | Mary Lil Wannamaker | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $386,707 |
73 | Craven Farms | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $386,299 |
74 | Hayne Haigler & Sons | Cameron, SC 29030 | $386,130 |
75 | William Richard Mcleod Sr | Sumter, SC 29150 | $384,494 |
76 | Bryant Farms Inc | Dillon, SC 29536 | $383,762 |
77 | James Collins | Olar, SC 29843 | $383,526 |
78 | Herbert M Brown III | Nesmith, SC 29580 | $382,244 |
79 | Billy Benton | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $380,877 |
80 | Daniel A Mixon | Orangeburg, SC 29116 | $380,616 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”