Farm Subsidy information
South Carolina
Total Subsidies in South Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 3,068
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Carolina totaled $165,170,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Steve Baxley & Sons LLC | Rains, SC 29589 | $128,061 |
82 | Crider Farms | Bamberg, SC 29003 | $127,932 |
83 | J L Norwood Jr | Darlington, SC 29532 | $127,575 |
84 | Carolina's Best Blackberrys Inc | Chesnee, SC 29323 | $125,000 |
85 | Kayson T Strickland | Nichols, SC 29581 | $124,588 |
86 | Jason M Tyner | Darlington, SC 29532 | $124,280 |
87 | David E Watts III Farms | Lake City, SC 29560 | $122,585 |
88 | Ricky James | Darlington, SC 29532 | $122,374 |
89 | Sylvia G Chapman | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $122,208 |
90 | Barnes Farm Partnership | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $121,177 |
91 | Beard Farms, LLC | Lake City, SC 29560 | $120,942 |
92 | Norris Farms | Society Hill, SC 29593 | $120,489 |
93 | Dry Creek Farms Inc | Pamplico, SC 29583 | $119,634 |
94 | James N Chapman Farms LLC | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $119,024 |
95 | Cole Norwood | Darlington, SC 29532 | $118,750 |
96 | Troy Harold Lamb Jr | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $115,590 |
97 | Gregg Covington Farms Partnership | Norway, SC 29113 | $114,411 |
98 | Thomas Gregg Bell | Loris, SC 29569 | $113,980 |
99 | The Promise Land Stillwell Farms | Mc Coll, SC 29570 | $113,852 |
100 | Dwight Paul Stevens | Loris, SC 29569 | $112,944 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”