Total Commodity Programs in South Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,223
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in South Carolina totaled $7,085,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jesse D Shirer III | Lone Star, SC 29030 | $21,065 |
82 | Sharp And Sharp Certified Seed Dba Sharp And Sharp | Allendale, SC 29810 | $20,998 |
83 | H Heath Hill And Son | Eastover, SC 29044 | $20,916 |
84 | Cameron L Breland | Ruffin, SC 29475 | $20,757 |
85 | Jerry Breland | Ruffin, SC 29475 | $20,474 |
86 | Bickley Partnership | Elloree, SC 29047 | $20,091 |
87 | Salkehatchie Farms, LLC | Olar, SC 29843 | $19,742 |
88 | Curtis Michael Moss, Jr. Dba Millwood Place Farms | Cameron, SC 29030 | $19,725 |
89 | Baxley Family Farms LLC | Georgetown, SC 29440 | $19,601 |
90 | , | $19,533 | |
91 | W H Bull | Cameron, SC 29030 | $19,336 |
92 | William H Bull Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $19,336 |
93 | Baxley & Baxley Farms | Dillon, SC 29536 | $19,318 |
94 | Rhett Covington Farms | Mc Coll, SC 29570 | $19,254 |
95 | Richard R Williams Jr | Sycamore, SC 29846 | $19,016 |
96 | Michael And Tony Poston Partners | Mullins, SC 29574 | $19,004 |
97 | Three Sisters Produce LLC | Columbia, SC 29201 | $18,831 |
98 | , | $18,826 | |
99 | , | $18,822 | |
100 | Kylie D Strickland | Nichols, SC 29581 | $18,642 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”