Farm Subsidy information

South Carolina

Total Subsidies in South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 52,876

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Carolina totaled $3,378,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
121Dargan Farms PartnershipDarlington, SC 29540$2,291,734
122Delano Kneece & Son IncPelion, SC 29123$2,266,344
123Fender FarmsReevesville, SC 29471$2,263,082
124John S Mcgill IIIKingstree, SC 29556$2,256,630
125William Richard Mcleod SrSumter, SC 29150$2,252,203
126Brogdon Family FarmsManning, SC 29102$2,241,499
127F B FarmsScranton, SC 29591$2,236,458
128Morgan's FarmSpringfield, SC 29146$2,223,290
129Jerry YonceAiken, SC 29801$2,198,110
130Pinckney G MurraySaint George, SC 29477$2,187,927
131W T Brogdon Jr Farms Brogdon FarmsSumter, SC 29153$2,184,733
132Old Thompson FarmsVance, SC 29163$2,177,562
133Dennis Matthews SrCoward, SC 29530$2,163,190
134W A Berry & SonBishopville, SC 29010$2,127,261
135J Robert Griggs Sr.Hartsville, SC 29550$2,119,954
136Daniel W JohnsonMullins, SC 29574$2,112,997
137H F Price & SonsDillon, SC 29536$2,107,779
138Houser FarmsBishopville, SC 29010$2,106,112
139Atkinson Brothers PartnershipLynchburg, SC 29080$2,093,453
140T & M FarmsUlmer, SC 29849$2,085,222

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag