Farm Subsidy information
South Carolina
Total Subsidies in South Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 3,068
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Carolina totaled $165,170,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Alton E Brown Jr | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $100,938 |
122 | David Farmer | Florence, SC 29501 | $100,718 |
123 | Harold L Elvington | Mullins, SC 29574 | $100,520 |
124 | , | $100,112 | |
125 | Pressley Johnson | Galivants Ferry, SC 29544 | $100,107 |
126 | Nimmer Turf And Tree Farm Inc | Ridgeland, SC 29936 | $100,000 |
127 | Timmy R Elliott | Nichols, SC 29581 | $99,886 |
128 | Willshire Farms Inc | Santee, SC 29142 | $99,562 |
129 | Thomas Elam Lee | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $99,445 |
130 | Hammond Farm 2 | Nichols, SC 29581 | $98,384 |
131 | I And P Farms LLC | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $97,771 |
132 | H Heath Hill And Son | Eastover, SC 29044 | $96,653 |
133 | Anthony L Williamson | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $96,242 |
134 | Eaddy Farms LLC | Lake City, SC 29560 | $95,811 |
135 | Jimmy W Ray | Galivants Ferry, SC 29544 | $95,799 |
136 | Dubose & Stukes Farms LLC | Summerton, SC 29148 | $95,715 |
137 | Fulton Farmers | Cades, SC 29518 | $94,963 |
138 | John Scott Mcgill Iv | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $94,948 |
139 | Crapse Farms | Estill, SC 29918 | $94,526 |
140 | Doyle W Oneal | Darlington, SC 29540 | $94,478 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”