Farm Subsidy information

South Carolina

Total Subsidies in South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 52,876

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Carolina totaled $3,378,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
141Riverdale Farms IncSumter, SC 29153$2,082,339
142Gregory Harold HugginsNichols, SC 29581$2,076,943
143Mayer Farms IncNewberry, SC 29108$2,066,572
144Drew FarmsMullins, SC 29574$2,060,344
145James H WeathersSaint George, SC 29477$2,052,768
146Crapse FarmsEstill, SC 29918$2,051,910
147Circle W FarmBowman, SC 29018$2,043,043
148Jerry Lee Mcelveen JrNew Zion, SC 29111$2,036,804
149Clinton T BoylestonWilliston, SC 29853$2,036,428
150Lester C Thompson IIIManning, SC 29102$2,012,837
151Hayne Haigler & SonsCameron, SC 29030$2,005,671
152Oak Lane FarmSaint Matthews, SC 29135$1,999,709
153Kym Farm IncElloree, SC 29047$1,998,709
154G M McleodSumter, SC 29150$1,977,992
155Joe & Joyce Atkinson FarmsBishopville, SC 29010$1,973,972
156Alva W Dannelly JrNorway, SC 29113$1,971,717
157Robert E ScottAiken, SC 29803$1,958,532
158Enterprise Bank Of Sc **Ehrhardt, SC 29081$1,956,709
159Delbert C InabinetOrangeburg, SC 29118$1,950,478
160Franklin R GleasonDarlington, SC 29540$1,940,971

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag