Farm Subsidy information

South Carolina

Total Subsidies in South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 52,876

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Carolina totaled $3,378,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
161Les GallowayDarlington, SC 29532$1,937,658
162Francis M Hinson IIIBennettsville, SC 29512$1,934,265
163Four J Family FarmsPinewood, SC 29125$1,927,886
164Willard Dorriety JrFlorence, SC 29501$1,926,097
165Anthony L WilliamsonKingstree, SC 29556$1,924,804
166Tony R RuckerPelion, SC 29123$1,923,777
167Pat And Blake Rogers FarmsBlenheim, SC 29516$1,906,943
168James B Johnson JrHartsville, SC 29550$1,898,550
169Funchess Brothers FarmsRowesville, SC 29133$1,897,865
170Cecil T JamesDarlington, SC 29540$1,892,417
171Matt Forrest Farms LLCJohnston, SC 29832$1,888,077
172W W Kirven IIIDarlington, SC 29540$1,880,008
173Charles A Beasley SrMayesville, SC 29104$1,874,632
174W L CokerAlcolu, SC 29001$1,871,056
175Strock Farms PartnershipElloree, SC 29047$1,862,199
176Billy BentonHartsville, SC 29550$1,860,295
177Gamble Family FarmsNew Zion, SC 29111$1,860,020
178Bickley Farms IncElloree, SC 29047$1,856,429
179James L MccutcheonLake City, SC 29560$1,847,883
180Thomas Elam LeeAlcolu, SC 29001$1,844,625

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag