Farm Subsidy information
South Carolina
Total Subsidies in South Carolina, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 7,296
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Carolina totaled $257,538,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $9,090,511 |
2 | Ag South Farm Credit Aca ** | Douglas, GA 31534 | $3,216,640 |
3 | Haigler Farms Partnership | Cameron, SC 29030 | $1,835,728 |
4 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,668,219 |
5 | Oak III Farms | Summerton, SC 29148 | $1,543,031 |
6 | Prestage Farms Of Sc LLC | Camden, SC 29021 | $1,500,000 |
7 | Satterwhite Farms LLC | Newberry, SC 29108 | $1,365,424 |
8 | Tolson Farms | Lynchburg, SC 29080 | $1,200,350 |
9 | Rogers Brothers Farm | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $1,133,612 |
10 | Calhoun Farms | Clio, SC 29525 | $1,008,927 |
11 | Bruce G Price & Sons | Little Rock, SC 29567 | $1,000,586 |
12 | Lemaster Livestock Inc | Gaffney, SC 29341 | $971,595 |
13 | Williams Farms Partnership | Islandton, SC 29929 | $954,805 |
14 | Connelly Farms | Ulmer, SC 29849 | $870,060 |
15 | Titan Fruit & Vegetable Co Inc | Ridge Spring, SC 29129 | $773,981 |
16 | Barnes Farm Partnership | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $753,620 |
17 | Rhett Covington Farms | Mc Coll, SC 29570 | $730,582 |
18 | Enterprise Bank Of Sc ** | Ehrhardt, SC 29081 | $720,172 |
19 | Walter P Rawl & Sons, Inc | Pelion, SC 29123 | $708,594 |
20 | Glasdrum Farms | Little Rock, SC 29567 | $685,803 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>