Farm Subsidy information
South Carolina
Total Subsidies in South Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,337
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Carolina totaled $172,237,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $6,377,459 |
2 | Ag South Farm Credit Aca ** | Douglas, GA 31534 | $2,215,020 |
3 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,359,995 |
4 | J E Cooley Farms Inc | Chesnee, SC 29323 | $1,096,836 |
5 | C S Mcleod Farms Inc | Mc Bee, SC 29101 | $1,012,448 |
6 | Rogers Brothers Farm | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $844,351 |
7 | Haigler Farms Partnership | Cameron, SC 29030 | $793,715 |
8 | Frank Howey Family Farms | Monroe, NC 28111 | $709,257 |
9 | Bruce G Price & Sons | Little Rock, SC 29567 | $704,394 |
10 | Titan Production Company LLC | Ridge Spring, SC 29129 | $674,338 |
11 | Enterprise Bank Of Sc ** | Ehrhardt, SC 29081 | $643,181 |
12 | J W Yonce & Sons Inc | Johnston, SC 29832 | $637,076 |
13 | Connelly Farms | Ulmer, SC 29849 | $632,739 |
14 | Barnes Farm Partnership | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $607,756 |
15 | Tolson Farms | Lynchburg, SC 29080 | $603,130 |
16 | Boyd Farms | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $539,376 |
17 | Titan Peach Farms Inc | Ridge Spring, SC 29129 | $533,651 |
18 | Palmetto Farms | Fort Motte, SC 29135 | $496,179 |
19 | Crapse Farms | Estill, SC 29918 | $463,613 |
20 | Calhoun Farms | Clio, SC 29525 | $455,525 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>