Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,168
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in South Carolina totaled $52,725,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Barnes Farm Partnership | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $271,677 |
22 | H&f Farms Lp | Lake City, SC 29560 | $250,000 |
23 | Rhett Covington Farms | Mc Coll, SC 29570 | $250,000 |
24 | Connelly Farms | Ulmer, SC 29849 | $244,959 |
25 | David E Watts III Farms | Lake City, SC 29560 | $227,792 |
26 | T & M Farms | Ulmer, SC 29849 | $216,211 |
27 | Rogers Brothers Farm | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $212,562 |
28 | Chappell Partnership | Barnwell, SC 29812 | $212,286 |
29 | Doyle W Oneal | Darlington, SC 29540 | $203,146 |
30 | Tristan A Dubose Jr LLC | Monetta, SC 29105 | $202,210 |
31 | H Heath Hill And Son | Eastover, SC 29044 | $200,572 |
32 | Infinger Farms Partnership | Saint George, SC 29477 | $199,252 |
33 | Bruce G Price & Sons | Little Rock, SC 29567 | $194,446 |
34 | S2 Farms LLC | Hemingway, SC 29554 | $190,791 |
35 | Michael And Tony Poston Partners | Mullins, SC 29574 | $187,630 |
36 | Jeremy D Breland | Ruffin, SC 29475 | $184,047 |
37 | Daniel P Gause | Scranton, SC 29591 | $182,071 |
38 | Robert E Crosby | Estill, SC 29918 | $182,034 |
39 | Martin Ira Easler | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $180,068 |
40 | Cowden Plantation Farms LLC | Jackson, SC 29831 | $179,365 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”