Farm Subsidy information
South Carolina
Total Subsidies in South Carolina, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 7,296
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Carolina totaled $257,538,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | Perrow Farms | Cameron, SC 29030 | $400,084 |
| 62 | Thomas G Chaplin | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $398,289 |
| 63 | Thomas Elam Lee | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $392,904 |
| 64 | Lee Newman | Sumter, SC 29153 | $392,391 |
| 65 | Strock Farms Partnership | Elloree, SC 29047 | $391,825 |
| 66 | Sand Hill Inc | Newberry, SC 29108 | $390,847 |
| 67 | Caughman And Son Farms LLC | Sumter, SC 29153 | $390,811 |
| 68 | C S Mcleod Farms Inc | Mc Bee, SC 29101 | $385,942 |
| 69 | Jimmy Forrest Farms Inc | Ward, SC 29166 | $380,019 |
| 70 | W M Smith & Sons | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $377,753 |
| 71 | Cowden Plantation Farms LLC | Jackson, SC 29831 | $377,038 |
| 72 | Donald Allen Riddle | Norway, SC 29113 | $372,575 |
| 73 | Griner Farms | Varnville, SC 29944 | $372,196 |
| 74 | Crider Farms | Bamberg, SC 29003 | $367,335 |
| 75 | Pat And Blake Rogers Farms | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $355,738 |
| 76 | Mr Johnny Boyd Mcmillan | Lodge, SC 29082 | $355,551 |
| 77 | C S Elmore/sons | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $353,818 |
| 78 | Walker Nix Farms, LLC | Elko, SC 29826 | $350,519 |
| 79 | Betty Allen Farms | Latta, SC 29565 | $343,891 |
| 80 | Kendall Wannamaker | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $342,438 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf