Conservation Reserve Program in South Carolina, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 920
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in South Carolina totaled $1,272,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Virginia L. Clyburn-ipock | Darlington, SC 29532 | $41,713 |
2 | R Allan King | Cassatt, SC 29032 | $19,873 |
3 | Ann Miller Brainard | Monroe, NC 28112 | $18,773 |
4 | Doyle Family LLC | Aynor, SC 29511 | $16,560 |
5 | Deer Hill Inc | Lane, SC 29564 | $14,820 |
6 | Truluck Farms Lp | Columbia, SC 29205 | $13,065 |
7 | Blackwater LLC | Aynor, SC 29511 | $12,449 |
8 | Carl L Cantey Jr | Salters, SC 29590 | $11,566 |
9 | Holliday Associates LLC | Galivants Ferry, SC 29544 | $11,551 |
10 | W L Clyburn | Bethune, SC 29009 | $11,322 |
11 | , | $11,098 | |
12 | Palmetto Land & Timber Of Camden LLC | Lugoff, SC 29078 | $10,258 |
13 | Lawton E Cox III | Johns Island, SC 29455 | $9,523 |
14 | Victor C Mcleod Jr | Camden, SC 29020 | $9,034 |
15 | Williamsburg Farms Inc | Pawleys Island, SC 29585 | $8,203 |
16 | William Hugh Epps | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $7,884 |
17 | Catherine B Pate Tr B Uw | Sumter, SC 29153 | $7,390 |
18 | Frank T Boysia | Florence, SC 29501 | $7,014 |
19 | John R Gentry | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $6,486 |
20 | Weneewood LLC | Griffin, GA 30224 | $6,484 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>