Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,785
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in South Carolina totaled $26,491,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $1,767,349 |
2 | Ag South Farm Credit Aca ** | Douglas, GA 31534 | $1,186,679 |
3 | Haigler Farms Partnership | Cameron, SC 29030 | $454,784 |
4 | Enterprise Bank Of Sc ** | Ehrhardt, SC 29081 | $389,474 |
5 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $307,434 |
6 | Connelly Farms | Ulmer, SC 29849 | $265,840 |
7 | Mclaurin Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $233,910 |
8 | Palmetto Farms | Fort Motte, SC 29135 | $226,212 |
9 | Crider Farms | Bamberg, SC 29003 | $222,238 |
10 | Rogers Brothers Farm | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $215,163 |
11 | Lyons Brothers Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $199,194 |
12 | Calhoun Farms | Clio, SC 29525 | $194,094 |
13 | Barnes Farm Partnership | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $192,956 |
14 | Gregg Covington Farms Partnership | Norway, SC 29113 | $179,008 |
15 | Perrow Farms | Cameron, SC 29030 | $178,898 |
16 | Crapse Farms | Estill, SC 29918 | $178,858 |
17 | Riley Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $173,446 |
18 | Rouse Farms | Luray, SC 29932 | $171,980 |
19 | W M Smith & Sons | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $156,647 |
20 | Corrin F Bowers And Son | Luray, SC 29932 | $139,758 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>