Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in South Carolina, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,607
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in South Carolina totaled $42,885,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jameson Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $145,010 |
42 | Delbert C Inabinet | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $144,492 |
43 | Double D Farms | Gable, SC 29051 | $142,203 |
44 | T & J Partnership | Estill, SC 29918 | $139,781 |
45 | Double B Farms | Bamberg, SC 29003 | $138,691 |
46 | Kendall Wannamaker | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $130,049 |
47 | Mary Lil Wannamaker | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $130,049 |
48 | Richard & Jane Rogers Farm | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $127,277 |
49 | Caughman And Son Farms LLC | Sumter, SC 29153 | $124,944 |
50 | Ted Shuler & Sons | Santee, SC 29142 | $124,279 |
51 | Riverdale Farms Inc | Sumter, SC 29153 | $123,172 |
52 | C & C Farms Of Brunson | Brunson, SC 29911 | $122,315 |
53 | H Heath Hill And Son | Eastover, SC 29044 | $120,363 |
54 | Triple C Farms | Sumter, SC 29153 | $120,108 |
55 | Delano Kneece & Son Inc | Pelion, SC 29123 | $118,955 |
56 | William M Shirer Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $115,894 |
57 | Thomas G Chaplin | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $115,550 |
58 | Jesse D Shirer III | Lone Star, SC 29030 | $114,950 |
59 | K D W Farms LLC | Mayesville, SC 29104 | $114,167 |
60 | Hayne Haigler & Sons | Cameron, SC 29030 | $112,980 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”