Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,785
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in South Carolina totaled $26,491,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Pat And Blake Rogers Farms | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $101,592 |
42 | C S Elmore/sons | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $97,619 |
43 | Ted Shuler & Sons | Santee, SC 29142 | $96,762 |
44 | John Travis Still | Blackville, SC 29817 | $96,498 |
45 | Infinger Farms Partnership | Saint George, SC 29477 | $94,016 |
46 | Drew Fogle | Neeses, SC 29107 | $93,756 |
47 | Delano Kneece & Son Inc | Pelion, SC 29123 | $93,703 |
48 | Delbert C Inabinet | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $90,561 |
49 | Jeff Reeves | Elloree, SC 29047 | $89,372 |
50 | Roy M Hungerpiller III | Cameron, SC 29030 | $88,130 |
51 | Kendall Wannamaker | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $88,085 |
52 | Mary Lil Wannamaker | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $88,085 |
53 | Double B Farms | Bamberg, SC 29003 | $85,428 |
54 | Harry L Ott Jr | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $84,983 |
55 | T & J Partnership | Estill, SC 29918 | $83,689 |
56 | Triple C Farms Of Sumter Inc | Sumter, SC 29153 | $83,573 |
57 | Sharpes Farm LLC | North, SC 29112 | $83,510 |
58 | Drew Farms | Mullins, SC 29574 | $83,330 |
59 | J Allan Mcdonald Farms | Tatum, SC 29594 | $82,102 |
60 | Walker Bros. Farm, LLC | Norway, SC 29113 | $80,735 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”